China Pakistan Economic Corridor:

Interdependence to Regional Integration

Authors

  • Saima Parveen Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Women University Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
  • Syed Akhtar Ali Shah Former Home Secretary, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-85.11

Keywords:

Geo-political, Economic Integration, Gwadar port, One Belt, One Road. CPEC

Abstract

In the changing regional geo-political scenario China, Pakistan and other regional countries are set to play a vital role in the emerging regional economic corridor. China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as part of “One Belt, One Road” grand strategy connect countries  with China through economic collaboration extending from South East Asia to the Europe through maritime and land routes comprised of emerging markets of Africa and Middle East energy resources.

This paper has investigated the significance of CPEC in parlance of theoretical framework of complex interdependence because the phenomenon of interdependence has tied state and non-state entities in economic and strategic dimensions. Regional connectivity results from systematic, upgraded and need-based interaction in perspective of CPEC for socio-economic, industrial, energy and trade development.

CPEC is important not only for Pakistan and China but also for the other regional countries such as Afghanistan, Central Asian Republics, Iran and India. As international and regional politics follows interest’s game hence CPEC has also become matter of concerns for both regional and international players which has been amply illustrated by this research. These concerns are followed by arguments that CPEC may be seen in a broader perspective of interdependency with emphasis on strategic and economic dimensions guaranteeing regional connectivity and integration.

CPEC can serve as a main trade avenue not only for China and Pakistan but for Central Asian Republics, Afghanistan, Iran and India as well. This study has argued that CPEChas the potential of becoming an energy transit corridor for growing economies. It has advantagesfor India also in form of improved infrastructure, communication and access to CARs market. Simultaneously it imparts an opportunity of flourishing and trade to the Afghanistan’s industries. Iran can also have benefit by ensuring Chabahar port outstretched to CPEC.

CPEC has potential geopolitical risks as hostile environment of South Asia and the respective power rivalry and policy shift of world powers towards this region as manifested by the US pivot to Asia and the former concern over Chinese presence in the Arabian Sea in Asian region, Gulf states considering of Gwadar Port as rival port, Indian opposition of CPEC by arguing that it passes through Pakistan’s held Kashmir on which India has also claim.

China and Pakistan in order to escape proxy tussle in Baluchistan need to settle Indian apprehension about the project, Confidence Building Measures (CBM) must be incorporated in order to promote closer ties with Afghanistan, Pakistan must attempt for having stable relations with Iran in order to overcome impediments to the CPEC success. By making CPEC a reality the benefits will be reaped by whole region and the very enmity of India with Pakistan and China can be turned into mutual beneficial economic relations. If India becomes a partner in the project then certainly the concerns of India will be settled down.

References

Barber, Christopher Ernest. The Pakistan-China Corridor: A new project will give Pakistan the tools of globalization. Will it use them?”, The Diplomat.27th February, 2014. http://thediplomat.com/2014/02/the-pakistan-china-corridor/

Chaudhry, Muhammad Asad. 15,000 Security Personnel to be Recruited to Protect CPEC. Daily Times, 2016. http://dailytimes.com.pk/islamabad/16-Jul-16/15000-security-personnel-to-be-recruited- to-protect-cpec).

Ferdinand, Peter. Westward ho-the China dream and ‘one belt, one road: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs 92, 2016, 941-957.

Genest, Marc A. Marc, Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations Belmont, CA: Thomson & Wadsworth. Gieco., 1996, 140.

Ian Price, Is the US Trying to Sabotage the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor? Diplomat, 2016. http://thediplomat.com/2016/09/is-the-us-trying-to-sabotage-the-china-pakistan-econom ic-corridor/).

Javaid, Umbreen & Rameesha Javaid, Stregthening Geo-strategic Bond of Pakistan and China Through Geo-Economic Configuration. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 129. No. 1 (Summer 2016), 123-142.

Jidong, Chen. Regional Railway hub in Pakistan and China's Role. Policy Perspectives Volume 10, No. 2, 2013, 117-122.

Jingjing, Ma. China-Pakistan economic corridor aims to boost trade between two countries.The Global Times, 2017.

Keohane Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1977, 10.

Khan, Aarish U. “Bringing Gwadar back to life” in The Spokesman, Islamabad, February 20, 2013, 93-95.; See also Raja Muhammad Khan, “Pak-China Strategic Relations: Regional and Global Impacts” in Regional Studies Vol. XXXI, No. 1 p.45.

Khan, Aarish, U. “Bringing Gwadar back to life” in The Spokesman, Islamabad.20th February, 2013.

Lee, Raymond. The Strategic Importance of Chinese-Pakistani Relations. August 3, 2016. Retrieved Feburary 10, 2017, from Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/the-strategicimportance-of-chinese-pakistani-relations

Luft, Gal. It takes a road. Institute Analysis, Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, USA, 2016.

Markey, Daniel S. and James West, Behind China‘s Gambit in Pakistan (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2016. http://www.cfr.org/pakistan/behind-chinas-gambit-pakistan/p37855).

Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004), 1-32.

Overland, Indra and Roman Vakulchuk, China’s Belt and Road Gets a Central Asian Boost Uzbekistan’s transformation will fast-track the new Silk Road, May 03, 2018.

Pakistan 2025: One Nation, One Vision, Ministry of Planning, Development, and Reform; Government of Pakistan. Regional connectivity is mentioned as one of the seven elements of the vision alongside: People First, Inclusive Growth, Governance, Water Energy Food, Private Sector, and Knowledge Economy, 88-89.

Ramay, Shakeel Ahmad. CPEC: A Chinese dream being materialized through Pakistan. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Pakistan, 2016.

Rizvi, Hasan Askari. Pakistan and the Geostrategic Environment (London: Macmillan Press),1993, 139.

Safi, Mariam and Bismellah Alizada, Afghanistan: Prospects and Challenges to Regional Connectivity, April 19, 2019. https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/afghanistan-prospects-and-challenges-to-regional-connectivity/

Saran, Shayam. “What China's One Belt and One Road Strategy Means for India, Asia and the World" The Wire (India), 10th September, 2015.

Siddiqui, Sophia. US not Happy over Pak-China Growing Relations, CPEC, Pakistan Observer, 2016. ,http://pakobserver.net/us-not-happy-over-pak-china-growing-relations-cpec/).

Trickett, Nicholas. What a US-Iran War Means for Afghanistan and Uzbekistan. The Diplomat, December, 13, 2018.

Wang, Lin. Opportunities and Challenges of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and Implications for US Policy and Pakistan. Asia Pacific Bulletin.Number 395, 2017.

Xuetong, Yan. Silk Road Economic Belt Shows China’s New Strategic Direction: Promoting Integration with its Neighbors. The Carnegie Tsingua Center for Global Policy, 2014.

Zhou, Gang. Former Chinese ambassador to Pakistan, at the Think Tank seminar on “Building ‘China-Pakistan Community of Shared Destiny’ in the New Era”, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-20

How to Cite

Parveen, S., & Shah, S. A. A. (2020). China Pakistan Economic Corridor:: Interdependence to Regional Integration. Central Asia, 85(Winter), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-85.11