Factors Responsible for Strategic Shift in Pakistan’s Post 9/11 Afghan Policy

Authors

  • Zarmina Baloch Visiting Lecturer, Department of Political Science, Islamia College, University Peshawar
  • Faiza Bashir Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science, Islamia College, University Peshawar. Email:

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-87.123

Keywords:

Operation Enduring Freedom, war on terror, foreign policy, security, national interest.

Abstract

This paper explores the factors responsible for compelling Pakistan to support the ‘Operation Enduring Freedom ‘led by the USA and its Allies in Afghanistan in 2001.The goals behind this operation were to dismantle the Al-Qaeda terrorist organization in Afghanistan. When the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan in 1996, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and UAE, were the only states who recognized their government in Afghanistan. Pakistan considers Taliban as a strategic asset for obtaining its objectives in Afghanistan. Regional and extra-regional powers such as, the India, US, Russia, Iran supported their client groups in support of their own national interest, in Afghanistan. However, keeping in view the US-India strategic partnership in the region, Pakistan changed its foreign policy, and supported the Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. This change of policy brought up economic and political, and security challenges for Pakistan. Terrorist activities, suicide killings, and bomb blasts hit the society. Since then, its security is in doldrums. The paper argues that serious internal and external security factors compelled Pakistan to change its policy towards Afghanistan in 2001.

 

References

Afroz, A. Najish. Before and After 9/11: Indo-U.S. Counterterrorism Cooperation. Journal of International and Global Studies Volume 9, Number 2,2017

Ashley J. Tellis, Jeff, Eggers. U.S. Policy in Afghanistan: Changing Strategies, Preserving Gains. Carnegie Endowment.org. May 22,2017 http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/05/22/u.s.-policy-in-afghanistan- changing-strategies-preserving-gains-pub-70027

Burke, S. M. Pakistan’s foreign policy: An historical analysis. Karachi: Oxford , 1973

Bruno, G and Bajoria, J.U.S-Pakistan Military Cooperation. Council on Foregin Relations. June 26, 2008. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-pakistan-military- cooperation .retrieved on 5th April, 2018

Borger, J. Al-Qaida Videos Show Poison Gas Tests. The Guardian. 20 August 2002.

Fayyaz, S. Regional Extremism and Militancy in South Asia (0ct, 2008), Paper presented at international seminar organized by Pakistan Institute of Regional Studies in collaboration with Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in Islamabad.

General Pervaiz Musharraf address to the Nation. 2001, September 20. The News, p. 3.

Gul, I .The Unholy Nexus: Pak-Afghan Relations under the Taliban. Pakistan: Vanguard, 2002.

Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985), 4.

Iqbal, N. Our own Society was being brutalized. The News, 2001, September 30

John H. Herz. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics 02 (02), 1950

Jones, Seth G. The Rise of Afghanistan's Insurgency: State Failure and Jihad. International Security, 32(4). Spring ,2008.

Jones, Seth G. The Rise of Afghanistan's Insurgency: State Failure and Jihad. International Security, 32(4). Spring 2008.

Katzman. Kenneth . Afghanistan: Politics, Elections, and Government Performance. Congressional Research Service 7-5700 . RS21922. November 30, 2012. www.crs.gov

Karpowicz-Korab, Julian, W., “Political Realism in International Relations,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer Edition 2017, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/realism-intl-relations.

Khan, H. (2005). Constitutional and political history of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford UniversityPress.

Khan, Aarish Ullah. The Terrorist Threat and the Policy Response in Pakistan. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Paper No. 11 September 2005 :16-19.

Khan, H. F. The United States, Pakistan and the War on Terrorism: Enduring Allies or Uncertain Partners? Global Terrorism: Genesis, Implications, Remedial and Countermeasures”. Institute of Regional Studies, edit., Islamabad, 2006.

Khan, Z. Strengthened Export Controls: Pakistan‘s Export Control Experience, Current and Future Challenges and Options Safeguards against IllicitTransfers: Pakistan‘s Institutional Response. International Conference Report, London: South Asian Strategic Stability Institute, 2006

Koshy, N. (The Natural Ally and the Tachtical Ally. Foreign Policy In Focus - Institute for Policy Studies. 2001, November 1. https://fpif.org/the_natural_ally_and_the_tactical_ally/

Loveman, Chris. 2002. “Assessing the Phenomenon of Proxy Intervention.” Conflict, Security & Development 2 (3)

Mearsheimer, John J., (2013). Structural Realism, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed, Oxford University Press.

Mehmood, Sohail. The Strategic Dialogue between Reluctant Allies: The United States and Pakistan Today, 2002. http://www.internationalpeaceandconflict.org/profiles/blogs/thestrategic-dialogue-between - Reluctant -Allies- The- United- States – Pakistan- Today

Mir Sherbaz Khetran, S. M. Indian Interference in Balochistan: Analysing theEvidence and Implications for Pakistan. Islamabad: Institute of Strategic Students, 2017

Musharraf Attempts a Tightrope Walk. (2001, September18). The News, p.2.

National Security Strategy of the United States, NSS 2002 available at www.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf. see also, George Bush remarks at Houston, June 14, 2002 retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/news/ releases/2002/ 06/20020614-8.html on 22/1/2011).

Patricia, Weitsman. Dangerous Alliances: Proponent of Peace, Weapons of War . California: Stanford University Press.2004.

Pakistan Assessment. (2003). South Asia Terrorism Portal, accessed September 7, 2007, http://www.satp.org/.

Pakistan to Review Afghan Policy. The Frontier Post .Peshawar. 2001, October 2.

Rashid, Ahmed. Descent into Chaos: The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia. Penguin Publishing Group: New York, 2008.

Salik, N. The Genesis of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence: Pakistan’s Perspective.Karachi: Oxford University Press. 2009.

Sav Explainer: U.S. Response To South Asia’s 1998 Nuclear Tests.Nuclear Issue. July 27, 2018 by SAV editorial staff. https://southasianvoices.org/sav-explainer-u-s-response-1998-nuclear-tests/

Schweller, Randall . Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Under Balancing. International Security 29, no. 02. Fall 2004

Siddique,Q. Pakistan’s Future Policy towards Afghanistan a look at Strategic Depth, Militant Movements and the Role of India and the US. Danish Institute For International Studies Report. Copenhagen. 2011.

Simpson, J and Littlewood, J. A Framework for Assessing UK Responses to CBRN Terrorism. British International Studies Association 28th Annual Conference.UK: The University of Birmingham. 17 December 2003.

Sutch, Peter and Elias, Juanita. The Basic International Relations. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, 2007

Shah, J. (Nov., 2012). Zia-ul-Haque and the proliferation of religion in Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21), 310-323.

Talib, F. Taliban Up Rises to Put Pakistan in Pressure. PIPS, 2008. website: http://san-pips.com/index.asp.

Thomas H. Johnson and M. Chris Mason. No Sign until the Burst of Fire: Understanding the Pakistan-Afghanistan Frontier. Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 32. no. 4. Spring 2008.

Vajpayee, Bush meet over terrorism war. Leaders discuss need to help rebuild Afghanistan. CNN.com.world, November 9, 2001, http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/11/09/india.vajpayee/index.html

Weaver, Mary, Ann. Pakistan: In the Shadow of Jihad and Afghanistan. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002:23.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Baloch, Z., & Bashir, F. . (2021). Factors Responsible for Strategic Shift in Pakistan’s Post 9/11 Afghan Policy. Central Asia, 87(Winter), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-87.123