Metaphor Used by the US as a Lethal Weapon of Mass Destruction against the Other for Pursuing Ulterior Motives

Authors

  • Siraj Khan Lecturer, Department of English, Kohat University of Science & Technology Kohat, Pakistan.
  • Arif Khan Arif Khan, Lecturer in English, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-91.183

Keywords:

Metaphor, Weapon, War on Terror, Discourse, Destruction

Abstract

To get access to the resources-rich central Asian states and to nip in the bud the state of Afghanistan, that had proclaimed itself under the Taliban regime to be a state run solely under the ideology and system of Islam- the next threat to The US after the socialism-the US, after the 9/11 incident, took resource to using the linguistic weapon of metaphor before and along the surgical strikes and managed to beset the thoughts of every individual on the globe. It was successfully used as a justification to approve finances from the US Parliament for mongering an uncalled for war, to enlist moral support of its citizens by means of instilling fear in them, to elicit active financial and personnel support of its European allies and to silence the international community from raising its voice against the attack. It is the domain of cognitive linguistic where  these  conceptual metaphor, or cognitive metaphor, are used to the understanding of one idea, or conceptual domain, in terms of another. This study focused on identifying the conceptual metaphors used in the War on Terror discourse for influencing opinion against the enemy and dehumanizing it. Metaphors are used in the conceptual domain of covering the false ideas of the US and influencing the world to manipulate and pursue their ulterior motives. There actual motive was to get the justified war on terror as legal and the only source of getting away with it. They influenced the world with their justified war on terror policy and gained their motives.  

References

Abu Fares, A. “A Bakhtinian Reading of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.” International Journal of Literature Studies 1, no. 1, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijts.2021.1.1.2

Charteris-Black, J. Fire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority. London: Bloomsbury

Kövecses, Z. “Emotion Concepts in a New Light.” Revista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, no. October 2020

Lakoff, G. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” Cognitive Semiotics 4, no. 2, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2009.4.2.5

Lawler, John M., George Lakoff, and Mark Johnson. “Metaphors We Live By.” Language 59, no. 1, 1983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414069

Said, E. "Orientalism, 2003

Spencer “Creativity,culture and education. 2012,

Turner, M. Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, and Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987

Turner, M. Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691227788

Zupnik, J. Y. “Norman Fairclough, Language and Power. London: Longman. 1989 Pp. x + 248.” Language in Society 20, no. 2, 1991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016316

Downloads

Published

2023-01-20

How to Cite

Khan, S. ., & Khan, A. (2023). Metaphor Used by the US as a Lethal Weapon of Mass Destruction against the Other for Pursuing Ulterior Motives. Central Asia, 91(Winter), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-91.183