Dr. Jahangir Achakzai*
& Dr. Zahid Marwat**
Abstract
The economic ties between Pakistan and Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) member countries date back to centuries, however, the progress achieved in this respect remained marginal because of different political and economic reasons. Despite these political and economic breakdowns trade between them through official channels i.e. the recorded trade, continued without much interruption. Pakistan has bright prospects of expanding its exports to ECO countries. Similarly, the members countries of ECO can, and need to, export more to Pakistan. The ECO region is full of potential, what is lacking is the will to cooperate with each.
Introduction
The world has turned into a “Global Village” mainly characterized by economic liberalization, privatization and globalization. In such a changing world the Economic challenges have become a central policy issue for both developed and developing countries alike. Presently the economic cooperation, whether bilateral, or regional, has become indispensable for facing the economic challenges. On the one hand the institutions like World Trade Organization (WTO) are working hard to multilateralism. On the other hand, there has been a significant revival of regionalism in the world. Regional preferential trade agreements of different kinds have been established as a result of which intra-regional trade has increased rapidly. The success of the European Union and ASEAN in promoting international trade and stimulating economic development has also encouraged other countries to form economic groups. The world has witnessed that; those countries that do not form a trade group would experience a reduction in their trade shares.
Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO)
Seen in this perspective, in 1964 Turkey, Iran and Pakistan put foundation of “Regional Cooperation for Development (RCD)”. Under RCD the cooperation was made in the fields of trade, communications, banking, industry, political and cultural affairs, railway and transportation. In 1985 the name of RCD was changed to Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO). After the disintegration of Soviet Union it was realized to cooperate with the ‘States’ separated from Russian Federation. Then in May 1992 not only the Central Asian States got the membership of ECO, but also Afghanistan was included in ECO. Thus the members of ECO increased from 3 to10 as Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. In this way, this organization became an ‘International Economic Forum’.
Main Objectives of ECO
The objectives of ECO mainly include; (a) Sustainable economic development of member states, (b) Progressive removal of trade barriers and promotion of intra-regional trade, (c) Development of transport and communications infrastructure linking the member sates with each other and with the outside world.
ECO Preferential Trade Agreement
The ECO member states launched ECO Preferential Trade Arrangement in 1991. The basic aim of the Agreement was to expand trade and other economic cooperation amongst the states through reciprocal exchange of concessions with a view to equitably benefiting all ECO countries, taking into consideration their diverse levels of economic and industrial development and respective trade policies. It plans a gradual liberalization of intra-regional trade through a step-by-step approach envisaging exchange of tariff concessions in raw, intermediate and manufactured goods. The ECO Preferential Trade Agreement provides for a 10 percent import tariff reduction on specified commodities. It provides lower Tariffs and other Non-tariff preferential treatment to goods coming from the member countries than to goods coming from outside the region.
Significance of Foreign Trade for Pakistan
The role of international trade in the development process of a country is vital. The role of trade explained by Adam Smith’s “vent for surplus” theory, culminated with Marshal’s “Engine of growth” theory, both placed the role of foreign trade at a high rank due to its contribution such as promoting growth through cooperative environment and generation of surplus for further acceleration of the economy. Moreover, the international trade serves as transmission belt for the transfer of the benefits of industrialization and modern technology from the developed to under developed countries . Higher rates of economic growth of developed, and specially industrialized countries, are partly the consequences of international trade.
In recent years trade with industrial countries is no longer an engine of growth for the developing countries as was earlier understood. The industrial countries have been increasingly adopting projectionist policies against the export of developing countries. Such restrictions are likely to become even more stringent in future particularly, under the World Trade Organization (WTO) regime. Furthermore, technological changes in industrial countries have led them, to the synthetic substitutes of primary products in which the developing countries have comparative advantage. Thus, in so far as it is realized that the growth of trade is necessary factor for accelerated development and structural change in an economy, and if in the existing framework of international trade, the necessary expansion of trade cannot be achieved, enhancement of mutual trade among developing countries appears to be the best alternative. Many developing regions, therefore, have initiated the scheme of economic cooperation with the foremost objective of enhancing trade among themselves.
Pakistan’s dependence on foreign trade has increased over the passage of time. Increasing dependence of the economy on foreign trade underlines the significance of this sector for the whole economy.
Table 1: Pakistan’s Major Exports.
Commodity |
90-91 |
91-92 |
92-93 |
93-94 |
94-95 |
95-96 |
96-97 |
97-98 |
98-99 |
99-00 |
00-01 |
01-02 |
Cotton |
61.0 |
61.3 |
59.8 |
57.9 |
58.7 |
64.1 |
61.3 |
58.7 |
59.1 |
61.0 |
58.9 |
59.4 |
Leather |
9.1 |
8.6 |
9.3 |
9.2 |
8.0 |
7.2 |
7.7 |
6.7 |
6.9 |
6.3 |
7.5 |
6.8 |
Rice |
5.6 |
6.0 |
4.7 |
3.6 |
5.6 |
5.8 |
5.6 |
6.5 |
6.9 |
6.3 |
5.7 |
4.9 |
Synthetic Textiles |
5.7 |
6.1 |
7.4 |
9.5 |
7.1 |
5.2 |
6.1 |
7.2 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
4.5 |
Sports Goods |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
3.7 |
4.4 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
Sub – Total |
83.6 |
84.0 |
83.1 |
83.1 |
82.6 |
85.1 |
84.4 |
83.5 |
81.3 |
82.2 |
80.9 |
78.9 |
Others |
16.4 |
16.0 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
17.4 |
14.9 |
15.6 |
16.5 |
18.7 |
17.8 |
19.1 |
21.1 |
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce and Trade Government of Pakistan.
The volume of trade is expected to increase further in the days to come. Because on the one hand Pakistan is opening up its markets to the rest of the world by removing tariff and non-tariff barriers and on the other hand getting access to the foreign markets. So one can easily anticipate that the dependence of economy on foreign trade is bound to increase drastically but the trade sector has limitations of its own.
These limitations stem from the reality that Pakistan has and is experiencing “commodity and geographic concentration” in trade.
Commodity Concentration
By commodity concentration we mean that our trade is revolving around very few items. Our exports are highly concentrated in few items namely, cotton, leather, rice, synthetic textile and sports goods.
The above table shows that the share of these five items in the total exports of Pakistan was more than 80% during the reference period except the year 2001-02 where it was slightly lower than eighty percent.
The situation is further aggravated by the reality that out of the 83 percent share of the five items in total exports, the share of the cotton group alone was 61% during the year 1990-91. The share of the cotton group was the highest (64.1%) in the year 1995-96. Although it decreased to about 60 percent in the year 2001-02, but still it was very high compared to the share of other items. The major weakness of this commodity concentration type of trade is that any short fall in the cotton crop seriously affects total exports earnings.
Geographic Concentration
Along with the commodity concentration, our trade sector is characterized by geographic concentration. By geographic concentration we mean that our major trading partners are few in number. Our exports are highly concentrated in few countries namely USA, Germany, Japan, UK, Hong Kong, Dubai and Saudi Arabia.
The degree of geographic concentration of our exports can be judged by the fact that about half (47.7%) of our export went to only seven countries of the world i.e. USA, Germany, Japan, UK, Hong Kong, Dubai, and Saudi Arabia during the year 1990-91. The degree of the geographic concentration was at its peak when these seven countries accounted for 55.3 percent in the total exports of Pakistan during the year 1993-94. More or less the same (55%) was their combined share in the exports of Pakistan during 2001-02.
Table 2: Pakistan’s Major Exports.
Country |
90-91 |
91-92 |
92-93 |
93-94 |
94-95 |
95-96 |
96-97 |
97-98 |
98-99 |
99-00 |
00-01 |
01-02 |
U.S.A |
10.8 |
12.8 |
13.9 |
14.4 |
16.2 |
15.5 |
17.7 |
20.5 |
21.8 |
24.8 |
24.4 |
24.7 |
Germany |
8.9 |
7.1 |
8.7 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
6.6 |
6.0 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
Japan |
8.3 |
8.3 |
6.8 |
8.0 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
U.K |
7.3 |
6.6 |
7.1 |
7.8 |
7.1 |
6.4 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
6.6 |
6.8 |
6.3 |
7.2 |
Hong Kong |
6.0 |
7.3 |
6.6 |
7.3 |
6.6 |
9.1 |
9.4 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
6.1 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
Dubai |
2.8 |
4.4 |
5.9 |
6.3 |
4.0 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
5.0 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
5.3 |
7.9 |
Saudi Arabia |
3.6 |
4.3 |
4.7 |
3.5 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
3.6 |
Sub Total |
47.7 |
50.8 |
50.8 |
55.3 |
50.3 |
51.5 |
54.7 |
52.5 |
53.4 |
55.0 |
51.8 |
54.9 |
Other Countries |
52.3 |
49.2 |
47.2 |
44.7 |
49.7 |
48.5 |
45.3 |
47.5 |
46.6 |
45.0 |
48.2 |
45.1 |
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce and Trade Government of Pakistan.
The condition is further worsened due to the reason that out of the total exports Pakistan exported one fourth (24.7%) to USA alone in the year 2001-02. While her share in Pakistan’s exports was only 10.8 percent during the year 1990-91. The share of USA was the highest (24.8%) in the year 1999-2000. Although it slightly decreased to about 24.7 percent in the year 2001-02, but still it was very high compared to the share of other countries. It shows that the dependence of our foreign trade sector is increasing on single country (USA) with the passage of time. This is not a good sign for the foreign trade sector as a whole, because such a high degree of concentration of our exports can create serious problems for the economy whenever there is shift in political relations.
Pakistan has a policy of having closer and growing relations with all countries in general and the neighboring ones in particular. The establishment of RCD (Regional Cooperation for Development) in 1964 is a step towards this end. Under this treaty several projects have been completed. The revival of RCD under the new name of ECO (Economic Cooperation Organization) has institutionalized the traditional relations. Under ECO several bilateral trade agreements have been signed which will increase the volume of trade relations between these countries.
The countries of ECO region are characterized by common historical, cultural and economic affinities. It is not only geographical proximity that binds these countries, but a deeper basis for the relationship is provided by their shared faith and belief in the eternal values of Islam. The affinities of sentiment, policy and stand between these countries are reflected in their working hand in hand in the organizations of the Islamic conference, United Nations the Non Aligned Movement RCD and ECO.
Close ties between the Muslims of the sub continent and the people of ECO countries exist since centuries. After independence of Pakistan these ties were strengthen more. The countries lent their full, unconditional moral and material support to Pakistan, and also stood by the side of Pakistan in the hour of need.
These deep-rooted bonds of friendship between Pakistani and the people of these countries remain stable and in fact have continued to grow. During the recent few-years the countries have come closer to each other and are cooperating in the industrial cultural and economic sectors.
The countries of the ECO and the areas, which are now known as Pakistan, used to have trade relations in the past and the caravans carrying goods from Indus to Persia, Central Asia and then, bringing in return consumable goods to this area. So these countries had been trading with each other since centuries on the basis of barter trade.
The available information presents a dismal picture of the current state of intra-regional trade in the ECO region. The member countries of the ECO still rely rather heavily on industrial economies for their exports and imports. The mutual trade in the region has been stagnant over time. The intra-regional trade continues to retain a marginal character in ECO. We may note that the RCD, which preceded ECO, could hardly promote economic development and international trade amongst its three member countries. ECO has an economic agenda and has already provided some preferential treatment to imports from the regional countries. Since the preference is rather limited, it has made very little impact on the intra-regional trade. Despite some efforts to strengthen regional ties amongst the ECO countries, intra-regional trade has been no more than 6 percent of the global trade of ECO countries during the year 2002-03. Pakistan’s exports to ECO countries during the same period were 5 percent and imports were about 4 percent.
Overview of Pak-ECO Trade
Table 3 presents an over- view of Pak-ECO trade during the ten years period of 1993-2003. Fluctuating trends come to surface in respect of Pak–ECO recorded trade i.e. trade through official channels. These and other relevant aspects of Pak-ECO trade are studied in the following part.
The best period was that of 2001-03 when the combined value of imports and exports averaged at $ 1552.6 million, which was 85% more than 1993-95 level. The two years period of 1995-97 witnessed improvement (37%) as compared to the years 1993-95, but that registered during 1997-99 was quite steep, 22% over 1995-97. However, the situation became favorable again in 1999-01 where 16% increase was reported in the combined value of imports and exports in comparison to the period 1997-99. The same trend continued during 2001-03 and the improvement was 49.5% against the figure of 1999-01(Figure 1). Except the years 1997-99 where the rate of improvement
Table 3: Overview of PAK-ECO Trade (Mln. us $)
|
Particulars |
1993-95 |
1995-97 |
1997-99 |
1999-01 |
2001-03 |
1993-03 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
1. |
Pakistan’s Exports to:
|
377.4 |
468.9 |
345.9 |
505.0 |
864.8 |
512.4 |
2. |
Pakistan’s Imports from:
|
461.9 |
683.0 |
546.9 |
765.6 |
687.8 |
629.1 |
3. |
ECO’s total Foreign Trade
|
116781.0 |
136058.8 |
124830.1 |
165500 |
211008 |
150835.6 |
4. |
ECO’s trade with Pakistan as % age of ECO total trade:
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
5. |
Pakistan’s total trade (export & imports) with:
|
33898.5 |
40726.2 |
35956.7 |
37347.7 |
42855.0 |
38156.8 |
6. |
ECO’s total trade (export & imports) with:
|
243724.7 |
310803.4 |
283417.8 |
343000.0 |
444429 |
305075 |
Source: Author’s calculation based on ECO secretariat data.
PAKISTAN’S TOTAL TRADE
Pakistan and ECO member countries exchanged, during 1993-2003, goods valuing 1095.1 million dollars on the average.
Figure 1: Pakistan’s Total Trade (exports & imports) with World and Eco 1993-2003
Source: ECO Secretariat data, Tehran Iran.
Figure 2: PAK-Eco Trade as percentage of total foreign trade 1993-2003
Source: Author’s calculation based on ECO secretariat data.
was a bit low (6%) as compared to 1993-95, the average value of Pak-ECO trade during the period was substantially more (37% in 1995-97, 51% in 1999-01) than that of 1993-95 period. The periods 2001-03 compared still more favorably (85%) with 1993-95.
The value of goods traded between these two regions, however, experienced an increasing trend in terms of percentages of their total world trade except the period 1997-99, where it was the same as in 1993-95 (Figure 6-2). In other words, Pakistan and ECO were much more important to each other, as sources of supply and markets for goods, in 2001-03 than in 1993-95.
Pakistan’s Exports
Pakistan’s exports to ECO maintained upward trend throughout the period under review except the period 1997-99. Thus, compared with the figure of 377.4 million dollars during 1993-95 (Table 3), Pakistan exported goods worth $ 864.8 million during 2001-03 and there was no decline during the intervening period except the years 1997-99.
Similarly, in terms of percentage of Pakistan’s total exports to the world the figure increased from 2.5% to 4.3% over this period (Table 4).
Table 4: Pakistan’s average annual exports to World and Eco during 1993-03.
(Mln. us $)
Sr. No. |
Period |
Exports to: |
|
|
World ($) |
ECO ($) |
Col. 4 as % of Col .3 |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. |
1993 – 95 |
14939.7 |
377.4 |
2.5 |
2. |
1995 – 97 |
17027.1 |
468.9 |
2.8 |
3. |
1997 – 99 |
16407.0 |
345.9 |
2.1 |
4. |
1999 – 01 |
17771.0 |
505.0 |
2.8 |
Source: ECO Secretariat Tehran Iran.
Market Share of ECO
Unlike the ECO market’s share in Pakistan’s total world export which increased from 0.3% in 1993-95 to 0.4% during 2001-03 (Table 3), that of Pakistan’s share in ECO’s total imports from the world decreased. Thus, during 1993-95 ECO’s imports from Pakistan accounted for 0.4% of ECO’s imports from the whole world, which reduced to 0.3% during 2001-03.
Pakistan’s Imports
Pakistan’s imports from ECO maintained upward trend throughout the period under review. Thus, compared with the figure of 461.9 million dollars during 1993-95, Pakistan imported goods worth $ 687.8 million during 2001-03 and there was no decline during the intervening period except the years 1997-99 (Table 5). Similarly, in terms of percentage of Pakistan’s total imports from the world the figure increased from 2.4% to 3.1% over this period. The importance of ECO as a source of import increased too (Table 5).
Table 5: Pakistan’s average annual Imports from World and Eco during 1993-2003.
(Mln. us $)
Sr. No. |
Period |
Imports from: |
|
|
World ($) |
ECO ($) |
Col. 4 as % of Col .3 |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. |
1993 – 95 |
18958.8 |
461.9 |
2.4 |
2. |
1995 – 97 |
23699.1 |
683.0 |
2.9 |
3. |
1997 – 99 |
19549.7 |
546.9 |
2.8 |
4. |
1999 – 01 |
21038.3 |
765.6 |
3.6 |
Source: Author’s calculation based on ECO Secretariat data.
Balance of Trade
With the exception of the period 2001-03, the balance of trade stayed favorable to ECO. The relevant summary statistics are given in Table 6.
Overall Trend During 1993-2003
In the previous section an overview of Pakistan’s exports to and imports from ECO was presented as a part of that of PAK-ECO trade in general. The present section continues the export analysis and studies the subject in greater detail; trend; composition, etc.
Table 6: Pakistan’s Balance of Trade with Eco.
(Mln. us $)
Sr. No. |
Period |
Imports ($) |
Exports ($) |
Balance |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. |
1993 – 95 |
461.9 |
377.4 |
-84.5 |
2. |
1995 – 97 |
683.0 |
468.9 |
-214.1 |
3. |
1997 – 99 |
546.9 |
345.9 |
-201.0 |
4. |
1999 – 01 |
765.6 |
505.0 |
-260.6 |
6. |
1993 – 03 |
3145.2 |
2562.0 |
-583.2 |
Source: ECO Secretariat Tehran Iran.
Trend of Exports
As observed in the previous section the trend in general was upward, if two years averages are considered. The average value of goods exported, in current prices, during 2001-03, was 129 % more than the corresponding value for 1993-95 (Annex 1).
But the going was not smooth. As will be seen in Annex (1), during the period of ten years bracketed between 1993-03, there were two such years when the exports to ECO dropped over the previous year, the exports decreased from 298.8 in 1995-96 to 170.1 in 1996-97 and 214.1 in 1997-98 to 131.8 during 1998-99.
Composition of Exports
The composition of exports of a country is determined, among other factors, largely by that of its domestic products and areas of comparative advantage over its trading partners. Unless distorted by artificial barriers and boosters, the export composition data can be taken as a good indicator of the area of comparative advantages of the exporter concerned, and a change in composition has important messages for policy makers and planners. Therefore, the relevant data in respect of Pakistan’s export to ECO countries are studied at some length in this section. Statistics on export composition are given in Annex (4).
Annex (3) shows that the agricultural commodities (item 1-4) accounted for nearly two third (65%) the exports of Pakistan to ECO member countries during 1993-95. The share of these four items was 54.9%, 27.9%, 39.6% and 42.5% during the years 1995-97, 1997-99, 1999-01 and 2001-03 respectively. Other important items contributing remarkably in the exports of Pakistan to ECO countries includes miscellaneous manufacture articles, animal and vegetable fats, petroleum and petroleum products, tarpaulins, sails, tents, synthetic fabrics and live animals chiefly for food etc accounting for one fourth of the exports in 2001-03.
This indicates that the pattern of Pakistan’s exports to ECO member countries on the hole has been consistent with the known areas of advantage of Pakistan.
The commodities like rice, cotton yarn and cotton fabrics stand out prominently regarding their average annual value during the ten years period of 1993-2003, having their share of 18.52%, 14% and 9.9% respectively. Out of these three commodities ‘Rice’ came out as the most important commodity having the average annual value of 18.52% in the ten years period.
The analysis reveals the fact that agriculture sector emerged as an important sector in the composition of Pakistan’s exports to ECO countries during 1993-03, showing the strength and stability of comparative advantage of Pakistan over ECO member Countries. This has important implications for future export strategy of Pakistan in relation to ECO countries which will be studied in a later chapter.
The top ten exports to ECO countries in different periods starting 1993-95 are given in Annex (5). As can be seen in the table, ‘Rice’, ‘Cotton yarn’ and ‘Cotton fabrics’ rank at the top. Again rice turned out as the top most commodity accounting for first rank in six years (1995-97, 1999-01, 2001-03) out of the ten years period. The second commodity in line was cotton yarn that changed its position from ‘first’ in four years period of 193-95 & 1997-99 to that of ‘second’ in the four years period of 1995-97 & 1999-01. In case of the third commodity namely Cotton fabrics the position remained unchanged and it ranked third in six years period.
Like exports, Pakistan’s imports from ECO experienced an increasing trend during 1993-03, and the average value imported during 2001-03 was higher than the corresponding figure of 1993-95 (Annex 1). The highest point in imports was reached during 1999-2001. To put the trend in concrete figures during 1993-95 Pakistan’s imports from ECO averaged at US dollar 231 million. These rose to 341.5 million dollar during 1995-97 after which the decline set in, touching the bottom of US dollar 273.5 million during 1997-99.It again increased to 382.8 during 1999-01. Finally it was 344 million in 2001-03.
As can be seen in Annex (1), Pakistan’s imports from ECO maintained unbreakable trend during 1993-97. After a slight relapse in 1997-99, the upward trend resumed and the highest point was reached in 19-01. The decline set in, and the imports reduced from 382.8 in 1999-01 to 344 million dollar during 2001-03.
Composition of Pakistan’s imports from ECO did not change much during the period under study. Bulk of the imports during 1993-94 was accounted for by Petroleum & Petroleum Products Annex (6), which was also the case during 2001-03 (the respective figures being 54.5% and 48.5%). Besides Petroleum & Petroleum Products, the next important item in the line was Fruits, Vegetable Preparation accounting for 7.9% during 1993-95 and 7.1% in 2001-03.The other important items in the import list are: Machinery, Raw Cotton, Chemical materials, Fertilizers, Chemical elements & compounds, Iron and steel, Ores and concentrates of iron etc. which together with Petroleum & Petroleum Products accounted for 81% of imports during 1993-95 and 82% during 2001-03. With the exception of Petroleum & Petroleum Products, which as stated above maintained its top rank in the import list all the other items in the top ten ones of 1993-95 experienced a change in ranking, Raw Cotton, Fruits, Vegetable Preparation, Chemical elements & compounds etc. improved theirs, while the rest sank to lower rank.
Conclusion
The ECO member countries have been trading with each other since centuries. The current state of intra-regional trade, however presents a dismal picture of in the ECO region. The countries of the ECO region mainly rely on industrial economies for their exports and imports. The mutual trade in the region has been stagnant over time. Despite some efforts to strengthen regional ties amongst the ECO countries, intra-regional trade has been no more than 6 percent of the global trade of ECO countries during the year 2002-03.
The ECO region is full of potential which has to be tapped and harnessed through joint effort of the member countries. So far the main reason for their low levels of trade is the lack of will to cooperate with each other. In order to achieve the objective of higher intraregional trade the member countries need to show that will of cooperation with each other which is absent at the moment.
Keeping in view the low levels of intra-regional trade, there arise the need for special efforts to devise ways and means to increase mutual trade among the ECO member countries. In the past, the countries of the region have been resorting to a number of policy options including; the policy of bilateral balancing or bringing regional trade deficit to zero. These measures resulted only limited success to increase the levels of trade to the inherent potential of the ECO member states. The best policy option in the give circumstances would be that each country is allowed to increase its exports to other countries in the region. This would ensure not only increase in the intraregional trade but also prove a source for stimulating economic activities in the region.
** Assistant Professor Department of International Relations University of Balochistan, Quetta.
References
Anam, M. and S.S. Rahman. (1991), Economic Integration in South Asia: An Exploratory Analysis in Trade, Investment and Finance, Journal of Developing Societies, Vol. VII: 139-158.
Anderson, K. And Blackhurst, R. (eds) (1993), Regional Integration and the Global Trading System', Harvester Weatsheaf, Geneva
Antoine-Mehanna, Rock and M. Kabir Hassan. (2001), Is the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) a Successful Trading Bloc?: A Middle Eastern Framework,' Middle East Business and Economic Review.
Balassa, Bela, and Luc Bauwens, (1988), Changing Trade Patterns in Manufactured Goods: An Econometric Investigation' Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.
Baldwin, R. (1993), A Domino Theory of Regionalism', NBER Working Paper4465, Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.
Baldwin, R. E. and A. Venables (1995), Regional Economic Integration', in Handbook of International Economics, vol III, Edited by G.Grossman and K. Rogoff, chapter 31.
Baldwin, R. (1997), The Causes of Regionalism', CEPR Discussion Paper 1599, London: CEPR.
Bank Markazai Jomhouri Islami, Iran (1996), Annual Review, Tehran.
Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami, Iran (1997), Economic trends (quarterly) Tehran.
Bhagwati, J. (1992), Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview', in de Melo and Panagariya (eds.) New Dimensions in Regional Integration, CEPR, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Bhagwati, J. and A. Panag ariya (1996), Preferential Trade Areas and Multilateralism: Stragers, Friends or Foes?' in Bhawati, J. and A. Panagariya (eds) The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements, AEI Press, Washington
Brada, J.C and J.A. Mendez (1985), Economic Integration Among Developed, Developing and Central Planned Economies: A Comparative Analysis',
Chacholiades Miltiades (1978), International Trade Theory and Policy', McGraw-Hill, New York.
Chang, W. and A. Winters (1999), How Regional Blocks Affect Excluded Countries: ' The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 2231
Clarete, Edmonds, and Seddon (2002), Asian regionalism and its effects on trade in the 1980s and 1990s' Asian Development Bank.
De Melo, J., Panagariya, A. and D. Rodrik (1992), The New Regionalism: A Country Perspective', in de Melo and Panagariya (eds.) New Dimensions in Regional Integration, Center for Economic Policy Research, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Economic Cooperation Organisation (ECO) Secretariat database, (2003). Theren Iran.
Economic Survey of Pakistan (2002-03), Ministry of Finance, Economic Advisory Wing Islamabad. Pakistan.
El-Erian, Mohamed, and Stanley Fischer (1996), Is MENA a Region? The Scope for Regional Integration, ' IMF Working Paper 96/30 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
El-Imam, M. (1990), Arab Economic Integration Between Two Decades' Al Mustagbal Al Arabi, No. 138 (August).
Foreign Trade of Pakistan' (Various issues) Export Promotion Bureau, Government of Pakistan Karachi.
Fernandez, R. (1997) 'Returns to Regionalism: An Evaluation of Non Traditional Gains from Regional Trade Agreements', The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 1816.
Finance Division, Economic Advisor’s Wing, 'Economic survey' (2002-03) Government of Pakistan, Islamabad. Pakistan.
Frankel, J.A. (1996) 'Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System', Institute for International Economics, Washington.
I.B. Tauris. (1993) 'Iran’s Economy under the Islamic Republic ' London. Institute of Regional studies Islamabad (1995) 'Pakistan and Regional Economic cooperation in SAARC-ECO'.
Joseph Frankel, (1964) ' International Relations', (New York : Oxford University Press, 1964) Pg .90.
Kamal A. R. (1995) 'Significance of SARRC and ECO for Pakistan' Institute of Regional Studies Islamabad. Pakistan.
Khan, Ashfaque H. (1995) ' Intraregional Trade in South Asia Problems and Prospects ' Institute of Regional Studies Islamabad. Pakistan.
Maqbool.A.Bhatty (1992) 'ECO Challenge and Opportunities in the 1990’s', Strategic Studies No. 2: 16.
Maqbol Ahmad Bhatty (Winter 1995), Pakistan and ECO', Regional Studies p. 103.
Mehmod Zafar (1995), Pakistan and SAARC – ASEAN Economic Cooperation' Institute of Regional Studies Islamabad.
Mukherjee, I.N. (1996), South Asian Preferential Trading Arrangement: Assessing Trade Flows in the First Round of Trade Negotiations'; Report Prepared for SAARC Chamber of Commerce and Industries, FES, New Delhi, India.
Mukherjee Reed, summer (1997), Regionalism in South Asia: Theory & Praxis', Pacific Affairs, Vol.70, no 2, pp.235-251.
Naseem Zehra,(1992), ECO challenges and opportunities in the 1990’s', Strategic Studies No 2 (1992) : 31.
Naya’s (1973), Fluctuations in Export Earnings and Economic Patterns of Asian Countries', Economic Development and Cultural Change, XXXI: 929-641.
Pakistan’s Export of Principal Commodities' (1994-95),Export Promotion Bureau, Karachi. Pakistan.
Pakistan Statistical Year Book', (Various Issues), Federal Bureau of Statistics Government of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan.
Peter, Allum. (1998), Inter-Arab Trade: Constraints and Prospects' Paper for the Sectoral Meeting on Trade and Development between the League of Arab States and the United Nations (Cairo, June 8-11, 1998).
Pomfret, Richard (1986), The Theory of Preferential Trading Arrangements', reprinted in Jacquemin, A. and A. Sapir (eds) (1989).
Rauf A. Azher (1995), Preliminary Assessment of Pak-India Trade Prospects' By Institute of Regional Studies Islamabad, 1995.
Review of Foreign Trade (Various issues) Federal Bureau of statistics, Statistics Division Government of Pakistan.
Review of Pakistan’s Exports (Various issues) Export Promotion Bureau Government of Pakistan Karachi.
Saeed Khawaja Amjad. (2003), Economy of Pakistan'. Lahore, Pakistan.
Salvatore Schiaro-campo (1978), International economics: an introduction to theory and policy', Cambridge. Mass.: Winthrop Publishers.
Salvatore, Dominick. (1987), International Economics' Prentice Hall International, Inc. New Jersey.
Shahi, Agha. (1992) ' The ECO, prospects and problems’, Khalij Times.
Shahid, A.Hamid (1997), The Economy of Pakistan’ Lahore, Pakistan.
Schiff, M. and A. Winters (1997), Regional Integration as Diplomacy', World Bank Draft.
Soloaga I, and A. Winter s, (1999), Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?' The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 2156.
Stern, J. J. (1969), A Note on the Structure of Pakistan’s Foreign Trade', Pakistan Development Review, IX, 212-221.
Sayed Rifaat Hussain,( 1992), Political Economy of Pakistan’s Relations with Central Asian Republics, ' Regional Studies (Autumn 1992), p. 4.
The Economist Intelligence Unit, U.K (1997-98), Country profile of Iran'.
The State of Pakistan’s foreign trade (1994-95), International Trade Organization Wing. Islamabad, Ministry of Commerce Government of Pakistan Pakistan.
Winters, A. (1996), Regionalism Vs. Multilateralism', The World Bank, Working Papers Series No. 1687.
Whalley, J. (1996), Why Countries Seek Regional Trade Agreements?' National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Series No 5552.
Wong, J. (1985), ASEAN's Experience in Regional Economic Cooperation,' Asian Development Review, Vol.3, No.1: pp. 79-98.
WTO (1995), Regionalism and the World Trading System' WTO, Geneva, April.
Annexure
Annex. 1: Pakistan’s total year-wise Exports to and Imports from Eco during 1993-2003. (Mln. US $)
Sr. |
Years |
Exports |
Imports |
Total Trade (Col 2+4) |
Trade |
Pak-ECO total trade |
||||
$ |
%Age |
$ |
%Age |
$ |
%Age |
Pak |
Eco |
|||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
1993-94 |
112.9 |
- |
181.5 |
- |
294.4 |
- |
-68.6 |
1.9 |
0.3 |
|
1994-95 |
264.5 |
134.2 |
280.4 |
54.5 |
544.9 |
85.1 |
-15.9 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
|
Average |
188.7 |
|
231.0 |
|
419.7 |
|
|
2.4 |
0.4 |
|
1995-96 |
298.8 |
13.0 |
285.0 |
1.7 |
583.8 |
7.1 |
13.8 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
|
1996-97 |
170.1 |
-43.1 |
398.0 |
58.4 |
568.1 |
-2.7 |
-227.9 |
2.8 |
0.4 |
|
Average |
234.5 |
|
341.5 |
|
576.0 |
|
|
2.9 |
0.4 |
|
1997-98 |
214.1 |
25.9 |
231.7 |
-41.8 |
445.8 |
-21.5 |
-17.6 |
2.4 |
0.3 |
|
1998-99 |
131.8 |
-38.4 |
315.2 |
36.1 |
447.0 |
0.3 |
-183.4 |
2.6 |
0.3 |
|
Average |
173.0 |
|
273.5 |
|
446.4 |
|
|
2.5 |
0.3 |
|
1999-00 |
214.1 |
62.4 |
309.0 |
-2.0 |
523.1 |
17.0 |
-94.9 |
2.8 |
0.3 |
|
2000-01 |
290.9 |
35.9 |
456.6 |
47.8 |
747.5 |
42.9 |
-165.7 |
3.8 |
0.5 |
|
Average |
252.2 |
|
382.8 |
|
635.3 |
|
|
3.3 |
0.4 |
|
2001-02 |
317.8 |
9.3 |
222.2 |
-51.3 |
540.0 |
-27.8 |
95.6 |
2.8 |
0.3 |
|
2002-03 |
547.0 |
72.1 |
465.6 |
109.5 |
1013 |
87.5 |
81.4 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
|
Average |
432.4 |
|
344.0 |
|
776.5 |
|
|
3.6 |
0.4 |
|
Total |
2562 |
|
3145 |
|
5707 |
|
|
|
|
Source: Author’s calculation based on ECO Secretariat data.
Annex. 2: Pakistan’s total trade with World and Eco countries. (Mln. us $)
Sr. |
Years |
Total World trade of: |
Pakistan’s trade with ECO |
ECO’s trade with Pakistan |
|||
Pakistan |
ECO |
$ |
4 as % of 2 |
$ |
6 as % of 3 |
||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. |
1993-94 |
15366.9 |
112463.0 |
294.4 |
1.9 |
294.4 |
0.3 |
2. |
1994-95 |
18531.6 |
131261.7 |
544.9 |
2.9 |
544.9 |
0.4 |
3. |
1995-96 |
20512.0 |
154450.8 |
583.8 |
2.9 |
583.8 |
0.4 |
4. |
1996-97 |
20214.2 |
156352.6 |
568.1 |
2.8 |
568.1 |
0.4 |
5. |
1997-98 |
18746.0 |
143661.8 |
445.8 |
2.4 |
445.8 |
0.3 |
6. |
1998-99 |
17210.7 |
139756.0 |
447.0 |
2.6 |
447.0 |
0.3 |
7. |
1999-00 |
18878.4 |
176500.0 |
523.1 |
2.8 |
523.1 |
0.3 |
8. |
2000-01 |
19930.9 |
166500.0 |
747.5 |
3.8 |
747.5 |
0.5 |
9. |
2001-02 |
19475.0 |
197947.3 |
540.0 |
2.8 |
540.0 |
0.3 |
10. |
2002-03 |
23380.0 |
247162.3 |
1012.6 |
4.3 |
1013.0 |
0.4 |
Source: Author’s calculation based on ECO Secretariat data.
Annex. 3: Pakistan’s exports (average annual) to ECO by major commodity groups (1993-95 through 2001-03).
(Mln. US $)
Sr. No |
Commodities |
1993-95 =100 |
1995-97 |
1997-99 |
1999-01 |
2001-03 |
|||||
Value |
Value |
% Change |
Value |
% Change |
Value |
% Change |
Value |
% |
|||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|||||
1. |
Rice |
87.904 |
128.26 |
45.9 |
33.378 |
-62.01 |
95.522 |
8.7 |
114.729 |
30.5 |
|
2. |
Cotton yarn |
116.101 |
66.06 |
-43.1 |
37.368 |
-67.8 |
44.861 |
-61.4 |
47.181 |
-59.4 |
|
3. |
Cotton Fabrics |
40.054 |
60.859 |
51.9 |
23.589 |
-41.1 |
36.616 |
-8.6 |
102.026 |
154.7 |
|
4. |
Cereals and Cereals preparation |
0.239 |
1.925 |
705.4 |
1.942 |
712.6 |
22.596 |
9354.4 |
102.882 |
42946.9 |
|
5. |
Miscellaneous manufacture articles |
3.869 |
10.38 |
168.3 |
26.0232 |
572.6 |
8.561 |
638.2 |
47.275 |
1121.9 |
|
6. |
Synthetic Fabrics |
10.687 |
26.005 |
143.3 |
27.959 |
158.2 |
25.089 |
134.8 |
19.672 |
84.1 |
|
7. |
Animal and Vegetable fats |
0.301 |
0 |
0 |
18.716 |
6117.9 |
41.695 |
13752.2 |
37.07 |
12215.6 |
|
8. |
Apparel of material other than textile |
1.364 |
34.152 |
2403.8 |
34.234 |
2409.8 |
16.098 |
1080.2 |
7.345 |
438.5 |
|
9. |
petroleum and Petroleum Products |
2.195 |
0 |
0 |
0.079 |
-2678.5 |
0 |
0 |
64.904 |
2856.9 |
|
10. |
Tarpaulins, Sails, Tents |
2.634 |
0.363 |
-86.2 |
0.247 |
-90.6 |
8.432 |
220.1 |
24.731 |
838.9 |
|
11. |
Clothing of textile Fabrics |
10.264 |
19.595 |
90.9 |
12.223 |
19.1 |
6.238 |
-39.2 |
5.253 |
-48.8 |
|
12. |
Carpet and Rags |
0.106 |
0.084 |
-20.8 |
1.953 |
1742.5 |
16.331 |
15306.6 |
9.8 |
9145.3 |
|
13. |
Leather |
1.806 |
13.304 |
603.3 |
7.224 |
300.0 |
5.48 |
203.4 |
4.896 |
171.1 |
|
14. |
Fruits and vegetables |
1.622 |
0.723 |
-55.4 |
2.412 |
48.7 |
4.395 |
171.0 |
7.813 |
381.7 |
|
15. |
Live animals chiefly for food |
0.566 |
0.895 |
58.1 |
0.190 |
-66.4 |
0.713 |
26.0 |
16.186 |
2759.7 |
|
16. |
Articles of Plastic |
2.379 |
4.758 |
100.0 |
9.547 |
301.3 |
13.24 |
456.5 |
14.305 |
501.3 |
|
17. |
Apparel of Clothing Access of non-textile |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6.237 |
6.2 |
12.0 |
92.4 |
7.7 |
23.5 |
|
18. |
All others |
95.309 |
101.537 |
6.535 |
102.951 |
8.018 |
27.133 |
-71.532 |
231.032 |
142.403 |
|
19. |
Total |
377.4 |
468.9 |
24.245 |
345.9 |
-8.347 |
505.0 |
33.810 |
864.8 |
129.147 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce and Trade Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
Annex. 4: Composition of Pakistan’s exports to ECO (Mln. US $)
Sr. No |
Commodities |
Average Annual Value During |
||||
1993-95 |
1995-97 |
1997-99 |
1999-01 |
2001-03 |
||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. |
Rice |
23.3 |
27.4 |
9.7 |
18.9 |
13.3 |
2. |
Cotton yarn |
30.7 |
14.1 |
10.8 |
8.9 |
5.5 |
3. |
Cotton Fabrics |
10.6 |
13.0 |
6.8 |
7.3 |
11.8 |
4. |
Cereals and Cereals preparation |
0.06 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
4.5 |
11.9 |
5. |
Miscellaneous manufacture articles |
1.02 |
2.2 |
7.5 |
5.7 |
5.5 |
6. |
Synthetic Fabrics |
2.8 |
5.6 |
8.1 |
5.0 |
2.3 |
7. |
Animal and Vegetable fats |
0.08 |
0 |
5.4 |
8.3 |
4.3 |
8. |
Apparel of material Other than textile |
0.36 |
7.3 |
9.9 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
9. |
Petroleum and Petroleum Products |
0.58 |
0 |
0.02 |
0 |
7.5 |
10. |
Tarpaulins, Sails, Tents |
0.70 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
1.7 |
2.9 |
11. |
Clothing of textile Fabrics |
2.72 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
12. |
Carpet and Rags |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.6 |
3.2 |
1.1 |
13. |
Leather |
0.48 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
14. |
Fruits and vegetables |
0.43 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
15. |
Live animals chiefly for food |
0.15 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
1.9 |
16. |
Articles of Plastic |
0.64 |
1.0 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
1.7 |
17. |
Apparel of Clothing Access of non-textile |
0 |
0 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
0.9 |
18. |
All others |
25.3 |
21.5 |
29.5 |
25.0 |
26.4 |
19. |
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce and Trade Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
Annex. 5: Value ranking of top ten commodities exported to Eco 1993-95 to 2001-03.
Ranks |
P e r i o d |
||||
1993-95 |
1995-97 |
1997-99 |
1999-01 |
2001-03 |
|
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Cotton Yarn |
Rice |
Cotton Yarn |
Rice |
Rice |
|
Rice |
Cotton Yarn |
Apparel of Material Other Than Textile |
Cotton Yarn |
Cereals & Cereals Preparations |
|
Cotton Fabrics |
Cotton Fabrics |
Rice |
Animal & Vegetable Fats |
Cotton Fabrics |
|
Synthetic Fabrics |
Apparel of Material Other Than Textile |
Synthetic Fabrics |
Cotton Fabrics |
Petroleum & Petroleum Products |
|
Clothing of textile Fabrics |
Synthetic Fabrics |
Miscellaneous Manufacture Articles |
Miscellaneous Manufacture Articles |
Miscellaneous Manufacture Articles |
|
Miscellaneous Manufacture Articles |
Clothing of textile Fabrics |
Cotton Fabrics |
Synthetic Fabrics |
Cotton Yarn |
|
Tarpaulins, Sails, Tents |
Leather |
Animal and Vegetable fats apparel of material |
Cereals and Cereals preparation |
Animal & Vegetable Fats |
|
Articles of Plastic |
Miscellaneous Manufacture Articles |
Clothing of textile Fabrics |
Carpet and Rags |
Synthetic Fabrics |
|
Petroleum & Petroleum Products |
Articles of Plastic |
Articles of Plastic |
Apparel of Material Other Than Textile |
Live animals chiefly for food |
|
Leather |
Cereals & Cereals Preparations |
Leather |
Articles of Plastic |
Articles of Plastic |
Annex. 6: Composition of Pakistan’s imports from ECO (Mln. us $)
Sr. |
Commodities |
Average Annual Value During |
||||
1993-95 |
1995-97 |
1997-99 |
1999-01 |
2001-03 |
||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Fruits, Vegetables & Preparations. |
7.9 |
9.5 |
7.3 |
6.2 |
7.1 |
|
Raw Cotton |
5.95 |
7.4 |
20.6 |
6.6 |
6.9 |
|
Petroleum & Petroleum Products |
54.5 |
53.5 |
26.1 |
54.8 |
48.5 |
|
Chemical elements & compounds |
1.04 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
7.9 |
|
Fertilizers manufactured |
1.34 |
0.7 |
2.2 |
0.5 |
1.4 |
|
Chemical materials |
2.09 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
0.6 |
2.7 |
|
Tires and Tubes of rubber |
2.82 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
|
Machinery |
9.27 |
8.9 |
8.3 |
8.1 |
4.8 |
|
Iron and steel |
0.12 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
|
Miscellaneous manufacture articles |
0.14 |
2.4 |
0.06 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Ores and concentrates of iron |
1.0 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
1.4 |
|
Cork and wood manufactured |
0.2 |
1.7 |
4.0 |
2.5 |
0.7 |
|
Manufactures of Non- ferrous metals |
1.7 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
|
Wheat and muslin Unmilled |
2.35 |
1.0 |
11.8 |
1.9 |
0 |
|
All others |
9.2 |
4.7 |
7.1 |
10.6 |
13.5 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Source: Ministry of Commerce and Trade Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.