It was descriptive study that explored the obstacles faced by English teachers and students in the Government Girls’ High Schools in Peshawar, province of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The tool for the study was a closed-ended questionnaire which was administered to senior teachers and students in order to get a clear picture of the challenges faced by them. The quantitative and qualitative treatment was given to the data. The data were converted into percentages which were further supported by graphic presentation. The outcome of the study indicated that overcrowded classrooms, heavy workload, out-dated curriculum, lack of financial resources, allocation of insufficient time and inadequate arrangements for any workshops for learning new techniques by teachers were major hurdles in teaching English. In order to solve these problems, some implementable measures were made which suggested that competent and well- qualified teachers should be recruited for teaching English, exposure should be provided for students in learning English, use of A.V. Aids should be made compulsory for teachers during teaching, new text books, mainly based on drill exercises should be introduced, spoken English should be made compulsory and district level education officers should visit the schools and check that proper teaching techniques were used by English teachers for teaching English.
Keywords: Obstacles, English teachers, students, high schools, problems and implementable suggestions.
There has been development of new means of communication among countries with the advancement of educational technology. The world has now turned into a “global village” where people communicate and connected with each other through a common language. English is the only language which is widely used in most parts of the world and provides a base for modern knowledge in all fields of human life.
The role of English language remained a controversial for many years in Pakistan. English is being taught as a secondary compulsory language in Pakistan. The major source of learning English in our country is the schools and formal classrooms where teachers focus their attention simply on English spellings, drills, syntax, morphology, and some formal grammar rules, cramming and vocabulary.
Today, in Pakistan we need to learn English mainly from the ‘utilitarian’ point of view rather than ‘cultural purposes’. But recent trends in the study of English in Pakistani schools are the challenges and problems faced by teachers and students. These problems and challenges warranted a systematic study to identify them for remedial solutions.
The study would be significant not only for the teachers and students, but also for the curriculum planners and school administrators. It would not only prove useful and helpful for concerned, but also motivate them to take corrective measures for the solution of the problems faced by English teachers and students. It would also provide guidelines for the teachers and students in the teaching learning process.
English is the dominant international language of the 21st century. There is a huge demand of English language in the world. It is accustomed by a quarter of the world’s population. As a result, English has assumed the role of international language instead of a language of a particular nation. It is spoken by billion of people around the world. By 2020, it is forecasted that two billion people will be using it or learning to use it.
It is a fact that English is taught as compulsory subject in Pakistani schools and colleges, but students are still not able to communicate in English with confidence and success. This is also true about the secondary schools students in Pakistan. It is therefore, high time that we should treat English as a secondary language and take corrective measures to facilitate teachers and learners in both rural and urban areas to acquire proficiency in English. Education department should design its courses with specific objectives and especially pay attention to useful books that link theory to application and last, but not the least, a proper feedback mechanism for teachers.
The standard of teaching English in Pakistan has deteriorated. Teaching of English in Pakistan is not up to the mark. The functional aspect is totally ignored in the schools and emphasis is only on learning grammatical rules through rote memorization and thus resulting in further decline.
The condition of learning English at secondary level is worse and there is a need to address the consequential problems seriously. Learning English language is a priority in the subconscious of people, but they are precluded to devise remedial measures for fulfilling their urge. The students got few occasions to learn English. Its not that the learner lacks the capacity, but the whole educational setup needs to be reshuffled and built up from the beginning.
The teachers were not sufficiently qualified and trained and there was no specific criterion for the selection of English teachers, but preference was given to those having master degree in English. The teachers used traditional grammar, translational methods for teaching English and there were no incentives for their good performance.
English is a major window through which we acquire the distilled essence of modern knowledge in all fields of human activity. It is through this language that we can come to know the day to day progress being made in the scientific, technological, agricultural, cultural and especially in literary fields. In order to teach English in schools, we need to change the existing conditions. If the conditions remain the same, the standard of English will further deteriorate and teaching of English will be merely a waste of time and energy.
In spite of making all the efforts, the desirable results have not been still achieved. The major factors are out-dated English courses, teaching programs, proper training to teachers, and availability of local materials so as to meet the students’ needs and expectations.
Input by the government, to improve the teaching of English, is not up to the mark but are also abysmally poor. The main cause of failure in English subject is a poor examination system, flawed pedagogy, and outdated teaching material and curriculum.
Many causes were identified for showing poor results in English which included no proper teacher training program, non-availability of facilities to teachers and students, out- dated curriculum, no particular attention to reading, writing, speaking and listening skills. Though majority of the schools have their libraries, but none of them have the provision of English newspapers, computers, and audio-visual aids.
Realizing the need and the importance of English, the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in collaboration with the British Council and Society of English Language Teaching (SPELT) provided professional assistance to teachers at each level across the province. But no improvement was observed in English teaching and learning and we still need to do a lot in order to achieve the desired results.
It was a descriptive. The population included 200 senior English teachers and 200 students of 20 government girl’s high schools in Peshawar district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. The sample was randomly selected from all the high schools which was 80 (40%) senior teachers and 80(40%) students. A closed-ended questionnaire was administered both to teachers and students. The primary data were collected from teachers and students while secondary data were obtained from office record, documents, and review of literature.
The study used closed-ended questionnaire for teachers and a separate questionnaire for students containing 20 items each. There was no problem in developing rapport with the participants. All the respondents willingly supported the study. The researchers personally distributed and collected questionnaires.
Qualitative and quantitative techniques were used in research. The quantitative data were converted into percentages and further illustrated with the help of graphs. Analysis of data collected from teachers is as follows:
Table No.1 Responses of English Teachers (80)
S No. |
Questions |
Positive Responses |
Negative Responses |
||
Yes |
% |
No |
% |
||
1. |
Classrooms are over-crowded |
80 |
100% |
Nil |
Nil |
2. |
Ask questions to review the previous knowledge of students |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
3. |
Speak English with students in class |
05 |
6% |
75 |
93% |
4. |
Any professional training for Teaching English |
03 |
3.7% |
77 |
96% |
5. |
Use A.V. Aids during teaching |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
6. |
Translation in Mother tongue |
80 |
100% |
Nil |
Nil |
7. |
Encourage English discussions in class |
05 |
6% |
75 |
93% |
8 |
Any preparation for lesson planning before class |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
9. |
Satisfied with students performance |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
10. |
Access to new technologies |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
11. |
Attend any workshop / refresher courses for learning new techniques |
05 |
6% |
75 |
93% |
12. |
Guidebooks are available in schools |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
13 |
Satisfied with the present curriculum of English |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
14. |
Face heavy load |
80 |
100% |
Nil |
Nil |
15. |
Breakdown lesson in small segments |
40 |
50% |
40 |
50% |
16. |
Question answer session at the end of each lesson |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
17 |
Sufficient time allocation |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
18 |
Classroom inspection on daily basis |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
19. |
Parental support for emphasis on English |
60 |
75% |
20 |
25% |
20. |
Use translation method |
80 |
100% |
Nil |
Nil |
The analysis of data in Table No.1 indicated that 80 (100%) respondents agreed that classrooms were overcrowded. Another, 10 (12.5%) respondents were of the opinion that they asked questions to review the previous knowledge of students and they prepared their lessons in advance. A negligible number of 05 (6%) respondents opined that they used English in class with students during teaching where as 03 (3.7%) respondents stated that they did not attend any professional training in teaching English. However, all the 80 (100%) respondents agreed that they did translate into their mother tongue, they were not satisfied with students’ performance and they faced heavy work load in schools. All the 80(100%) respondents agreed that they had no access to new technologies because of lack of resources. Only 05(6%) respondents opined that they attended workshop/refresher courses for updating their pedagogical skills. 80 (100%) respondents agreed that no guide books were available in schools from which they could seek guidance. A negligible number of 10(12.5%) respondents were of opinion that they were satisfied with present curriculum. 40(50%) respondents opined that they had question answer session at the end of each lesson. Only 10(12.5%) respondents agreed that they conducted classroom inspections on a daily basis. Another, 60 (75%) respondents were of the opinion that parents gave priority to English language. The graphic presentation of data in Figure-1 further highlighted the responses. Analysis of response of students is given in Table-2.
Table No.2: Responses of Students (80)
S No. |
Questions |
Positive Responses |
Negative Responses |
||
Yes |
% |
No |
% |
||
1. |
The teacher states the objectives of the lesson to the student |
40 |
50% |
40 |
50 |
2. |
Discuss the importance of the lesson |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
3 |
Gives examples to teach main points |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
4. |
Give information, step by step & gradually |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
5. |
English conversation class |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
6. |
Teachers command over subject & used correct pronunciation |
20 |
25% |
60 |
75% |
7. |
Utilize and manage class time |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
8. |
Group/pair work techniques used by teachers |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
9. |
Emphasis on improving reading and writing skills |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
10. |
Provide positive feedback and made corrections |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
11. |
Satisfied with the teachers performance |
20 |
25% |
60 |
75% |
12. |
Classroom environment conducive for learning English |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
13. |
Need to introduce changes in curriculum |
80 |
100% |
Nil |
Nil |
14. |
Voice clarity& eye contact |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
15. |
Assign homework to students on daily basis |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
16. |
Teachers use English in class |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
17. |
Encourage students for good performance |
20 |
25% |
60 |
75% |
18. |
Emphasis on cramming or conceptual ideas |
20 |
25% |
60 |
75% |
19 |
Importance to course content or go beyond the syllabus |
10 |
12.5% |
70 |
90% |
20. |
Use of A.V. Aids during teaching |
Nil |
Nil |
80 |
100% |
The analysis of data in Table No.2 indicated that 40(50%) respondents agreed that teachers stated objectives of the lesson to students. Another, 80 (100%) respondents were not of the opinion that teachers neither discussed the importance of lesson nor did they give examples to teach main points. However, 80(100%) respondents opined that teachers did not give information gradually and had no English conversation class. A negligible number of 20 (25%) respondents opined that teachers had command on English subject and used correct pronunciation whereas 10 (12.5%) respondents stated that teachers utilized and managed class time properly. 80(100%) respondents were of the opinion that teachers never used group techniques in class nor did they give importance on improving reading and writing skills. However, 20 (25%) respondents agreed that they were satisfied with their teachers performance, encouraged students on their good performance and paid attention on concepts rather than rote memorization 10(12.5%) respondents agreed that classroom environment remained favorable for learning English and teachers were not always stick to the course content. 80(100%) respondents opined that the teachers neither used A.V. Aids during teaching nor did they used English in class. Only 10(12.5%) teachers had correct pronunciation. The graphic presentation of data in Figure-2 further highlighted the responses.
Based on the analysis of data and conclusions drawn from them, the following recommendations were made for remedial solutions of the problem.
Published Books
Mueen, A., [1992]: English Language Teaching in Pakistan. National Book Foundation, Islamabad.
Tahir, M.S., [1991]: Modern Approaches to Teaching of English as a Second Language. Lahore, Majeed Book Depot.
Newspaper\Journals\Weekly Magazines\Pamphlets\Circulars
Abbas, S., [1998]: Sociopolitical Dimensions in Language: English in Context in Pakistan. In Journal of Applied Language Studies, 23(42).
Ahmad, N., Ahmad, M. A. Bukhari & T.A. Bukhari ,[2011]: The Nature of Difficulties in Learning English by the Students at Secondary School Level in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Practice,10(2).
Ahmad, N., Khan. N; Munir, N., [2013]: Factors Affecting the Learning of English at Secondary School Level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. In International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2).
Teevno, R.A., [2011]: Challenges in Teaching and Learning of English at Secondary Level Class X. In International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2(31).
Sabiha, S., [2003]: Language Planning in Higher Education: Issues of Access and Equity. In The Lahore Journal of Economics,.8(2).
Warsi. J., [2007]: Conditions Under Which English is Taught in Pakistan: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. Harvard University, Cambridge. Website: http://www.saridjournal/.org/2004/warsi.htm.
Organizational Document
British Council. [2013]: The English Effect: The Impact of English, What Its Worth to the UK and Why it Matters to the World. UK.
* Currently serves as Assistant Professor in the Institute of Education and Research, University of Peshawar.
British Council. The English Effect: The Impact of English, What Its Worth to the UK and Why It Matters To The World. Mark Robinson, UK 2013
Warsi. J., Conditions under which English is Taught in Pakistan: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. Harvard University, Cambridge 2007. Retrieved from http://www.saridjournal/.org/2004/warsi.htm.
Ahmad, N., Ahmad, M. A. Bukhari & T.A. Bukhari., The Nature of Difficulties in Learning English by the Students at Secondary School Level in Pakistan.In Journal of Education and Practice .10(2), 2011, pp. 18-24.
Ahmad, N., Khan. N; Munir, N. Factors affecting the learning of English at secondary school level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. In International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 2013, pp. 95-101.
Tahir. M.S., Modern Approaches to Teaching of English as a Second Language. Majeed Book Depot, Lahore, 1991.
Sabiha, S., Language Planning in Higher Education: Issues of Access and Equity. In The Lahore Journal of Economics, 8(2), 2003.
Abbas, S., Sociopolitical Dimensions in Language: English in Context in Pakistan.In Journal of Applied Language Studie, 23(42), 1998..